By George Jahn
The Associated Press
internal Web site of the U.N. nuclear monitor, said its fear of attack from
In the letter,
had repeatedly allowed confidential information crucial to the country's
security to be leaked.
The IAEA, in response, urged
would be in defiance of the monitor's 35-nation board. Both the Iranian
document and the confidential IAEA response were made available to The
The exchange reflected heightened tensions between
Vienna-based IAEA arising from the country's refusal to heed the U.N.
Security Council and freeze uranium enrichment and the council's decision
earlier this week to increase sanctions in response to the Islamic
republic's nuclear defiance.
The IAEA also is waiting for
remote cameras at key locations at
No enrichment is yet taking place at Natanz, but diplomats accredited to
the IAEA said Friday it may start within days. If so, those cameras are
crucial for IAEA experts in their efforts to monitor possible attempts to
reconfigure machinery there into making weapons grade uranium - used in the
fissile core of nuclear warheads.
generating nuclear power. But the international community increasingly fears
that the country may want to develop enrichment for weapons uses.
about any new nuclear facilities planned - a decision the government
spokesman Gholan Hossein Elham said came in response to the "illegal and
bullying resolution by (the) Security Council."
Expanding on the decision, the confidential letter, dated March 29,
declared that "the
the use of force and attack against the Islamic Republic of Iran and have
repeatedly stressed that military action is an option on the table.
"So long as such threats of military action persist,
but (to) protect its security through all means possible, including
protection of information which can facilitate openly stated and aggressive
military objectives of the war mongers," said the letter, signed by Ali
Blaming the IAEA for failing "systematically and repeatedly to maintain
confidentiality of sensitive information," Soltanieh wrote that "therefore
such dangerous dissemination of sensitive information will have to be
curtailed through steps which limit their scope and availability."
The agency, in response, noted in its Friday response that the move is
"contrary to the board's decision and suggested it may indirectly be in
breach of agreements linked to the Nonproliferation Treaty.
a deputy of senior IAEA official Vilmos Cserveny, urged the Iranian
authorities "to reconsider their decision."
planned new nuclear construction before such construction begins - a
commitment it has not always kept.
Former U.N. nuclear inspector David Albright said
allow for clandestine nuclear work related to its enrichment program.
Albright, whose his Washington-based Institute for Science and
International Security tracks Iran's nuclear program, said that Iran may be
looking to build a "backup facility" for enrichment that would remain
undetected - and safe - in case of attack by the United States or Israel.