Nonpareil War Criminal Kissinger on Attacking Iran
Saturday July 16th 2005, 1:52 pm  

Mega war criminal and New World Order huckster Henry Kissinger believes if Iran gets its hands on nukes a future London attack will be nuclear, resulting in the death of “100,000 people.” Kissinger “says that if Iran secures nuclear weapons, nonproliferation may cease to be a ‘meaningful policy, and then we live in a world of multiple nuclear centers. And then we’d have to ask ourselves what the world would look like if the [terrorist] bombs in London [on July 7] had been nuclear and 100,000 people had been killed,’” the Criminal Council on Foreign Relations reports. Herr Henry is disappointed with the Europeans because they “won’t make any sacrifice for anything, either domestically or abroad,” in other words they are disinterested in donating their kids to the globalist agenda in Iraq and eventually in Iran, Syria, and elsewhere in the Muslim world.

Henry tells us he is “not adverse to thinking about” attacking Iran, and this lack of aversion should not be surprising since Kissinger gave a green light to the butcher Suharto in Indonesia to attack East Timor (100,000 to 250,000 people killed out of a population of about 600,000), helped Nixon engineer and then protect the Pinochet coup and regime in Chile (colluding with transnational corporations such as Pepsico and ITT and resulting in the murder of 30,000 people, as declassified US documents reveal), directed the criminal bombing of Cambodia (200,000 casualties), thus paving the way for the genocide-loving Pol Pot (who slaughtered 1.6 million), gave a wink and a nod to West Pakistan’s genocide against Bengalis in East Pakistan, and various other scurrilous crimes against humanity.

Recall one of Kissinger’s more memorable quotes: “Covert action should not be confused with missionary work,” although the following comes in a close second: “I don’t see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its people. The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves.” So is it possible Kissinger would support an invasion and/or invasion of Iran?

Bet on it.